Improving U.S. Stock Return Forecasts: A “Fair-Value” CAPE Approach

  • Joseph Davis, Roger Aliaga-Diaz, Harshdeep Ahluwalia, and Ravi Tolani
  • Journal of Portfolio Management
  • A version of this paper can be found here
  • Want to read our summaries of academic finance papers? Check out our Academic Research Insight category

What are the research questions?

The authors propose and test an enhanced Shiller model that incorporates macroeconomic conditions, by modeling real bond yields and volatility, equity volatility and inflation, in a 2 step approach to forecasting equity returns.  The underlying thesis is that the level of mean reversion in the CAPE ratio varies with the state of the economy and is not a fixed long-run target.

  1. Can forecast accuracy be improved with an enhancement to the long-term mean reversion form of the Shiller CAPE ratio by incorporating macroeconomic conditions into the estimate?
  2. Comparison of Stock Forecasting Approaches:

What are the Academic Insights?

  1. YES.  The mean forecast error of the 2-step model post-1985 is 4.1%  compared to 7.8% for the traditional model, with immaterial differences prior to that period.  The authors attribute the outperformance to several issues:
    1. The Shiller model has exhibited next to no mean reversion, falling below its long-term average only one time since 1985;
    2. The notion that the CAPE ratio has a steady-state level is unrealistic and in fact, the level of mean reversion varies with the state of the economy;
    3. Lower real bond yields imply lower real earnings yields and therefore higher CAPE ratios.  In the absence of a large difference between real bond yields and their long term averages at the point in time the forecast is made, the models should (and do) perform similarly.

Why does it matter?

The weakening of the out of sample performance of the traditional CAPE model is likely a reflection of instability in the mean reversion process that is the foundation of the model.  The average return to which stocks have reverted and the speed of the reversion have not been constant over time.  Notwithstanding any estimation bias that may exist, the explicit relationship between bond yields/cost of capital  and earnings yields/expected return on equity have a measurable impact on the Shiller CAPE forecast. Instability in this relationship means that the CAPE ratio itself may not revert to a fixed long run average and the consequent instability in the CAPE ratio corresponds to material changes in real yields over the period of this study.
Continua a leggere su AlphaArchitect

Vuoi ricevere le notizie di Bluerating direttamente nella tua Inbox? Iscriviti alla nostra newsletter!